Satellite Providers

News

Versione lingua:

The Controversy Surrounding Mongolia’s Decision to Adopt Starlink Internet Services

Multipolarity refers to a distribution of power where multiple states possess a similar amount of power. The concept raises questions about its feasibility in a world marked by diversity. Additionally, it is important to determine whether those advocating for multipolarity truly intend to lead the international community towards this model, without relying on cliched definitions inherited from older ideologies.

China has emerged as a vocal supporter of multipolarity, proposing a three-power polarity framework to manage global affairs. However, doubts arise when considering China’s attempts to establish hegemony over Asia and Africa, making one question whether Beijing truly envisions treating other nations as equals.

Mongolia’s case is a telling example of China’s double standards regarding the concept of multipolarity. Recently, Mongolia made the decision to adopt SpaceX’s Starlink internet services. This move is part of Mongolia’s ongoing digital transformation efforts, aiming to improve internet access throughout the country, particularly in remote areas. Mongolia’s Minister for Digital Development and Communication, Uchral Nyam-Osor, stated that this technology would greatly benefit herders, businesses, and miners, enhancing their access to global information.

However, China raised objections to Mongolia’s decision, citing concerns over security threats and circumvention of its strict censorship regime. China’s Golden Shield Project, known as the “Great Firewall,” blocks access to foreign websites, unless individuals use a virtual private network (VPN). China argues that Starlink’s satellite technology poses risks to its national security, particularly during wartime.

Amidst these objections, Mongolia defended its decision. It emphasized the need to modernize its information industry and justified the agreement with Starlink as part of its New Recovery Policy. Despite China’s effective blocking of foreign websites, it questioned the lack of trust in deterring Starlink. Mongolia’s Ministry of Digital Development and Communication spokesperson highlighted that using Starlink’s services would not impact Mongolia’s relations with neighboring states, as cross-border communications are governed by international treaties.

In conclusion, the controversy surrounding Mongolia’s adoption of Starlink internet services highlights the complexities of implementing multipolarity. While Mongolia pursues its digital development goals, China has raised security concerns. It is crucial for the international community to adhere to clear rules and practices. If the ultimate objective of multipolarity is to improve people’s welfare, Mongolia’s decision aligns with this goal. However, China’s actions raise doubts about its true commitment to multipolarity, suggesting that it prioritizes its own security concerns over fostering international cooperation and development.

The post The Controversy Surrounding Mongolia’s Decision to Adopt Starlink Internet Services appeared first on satProviders.

Aït Bou Rhedir | Shahristān | Saint-Martin-en-Vercors | Bowatta | Abendanon of Tabbetje | Id Ou Manr | El Tintón | Qorabuloq | Valea Alunișului | Bara Mādhabpur | Starikovy | Wādī Qawwī | Gerbolina | Yongban-dong